How do Women Go Our Way?

The Restoration Document lies at the heart of WGOW. Within it, women voluntarily cede legal power of attorney to a male guardian or trustee—either through binding contract or symbolic act. This initiates real-world change in domains long dominated by radicals, and transcends mere discourse. WGOW Online serves as a resource hub, offering templates, infographics, and guidance. At no stage is coercion involved; participation demands willing commitment to the higher cause of Concordia. Women are already empowered—so let them wield that power; what fortune, that the very gift exalted by radicals may be turned against them, like a Golden Fleece returned to rightful hands. One might even speak of its inevitability: the double edge of reversal now turned to just use. We do not offer legal advice or official documentation; all actions remain your own responsibility and must be undertaken with discernment.

WGOW is a true campaign of women’s empowerment. Wardship under a man is the highest form of empowerment for a woman—precisely why radicals seek to deny it. They would rather you remain their pawn, estranged from the masculine and weakened, your soul turned against your natural source of prosperity. A man, in his rightful place, is a woman’s strength, her shelter, her home, her leader, her guardian. WGOW restores empowerment through masculine guidance and protection—not through humanist abstractions, nation-state destabilisation, regime-change propaganda, or depopulation engineering masked as ‘empowerment’ and ‘health care’. Nor through the parasitic abuse of men and children for profit. Every time a woman is weaponised by political subverters or lecherous attorneys against a man, she is turned against another woman’s son, set in opposition to her foremothers, and—often enough—even to her own child. Daughters forsake mothers; mothers betray sons and daughters. This foreign malignancy must be rooted out; its damages repaired with foresight and will.

How Do Conservatorship and Power of Attorney Differ?

Conservatorship is a legal arrangement in which a court appoints a conservator to manage the personal or financial affairs of an individual (the conservatee) who is deemed incapable due to mental or physical impairment. It differs from Power of Attorney (POA) in several key respects:

• Volition: Conservatorship is involuntary; the conservatee does not grant consent and has limited influence over the choice of conservator. POA, by contrast, is entirely voluntary—the principal selects the agent and retains the right to revoke the authority at any time.

• Establishment: Conservatorship arises through judicial proceedings, requiring formal hearings and medical evaluation. POA is executed through a signed legal instrument, typically notarised or witnessed.

• Oversight: Conservatorship entails ongoing court supervision; conservators must submit regular reports and financial accountings. POA operates independently of the court unless contested.

Both mechanisms are designed to assist individuals unable to manage their own affairs, yet they carry markedly different legal consequences and degrees of autonomy. Legal counsel should be sought to determine the most appropriate course.

How am I supposed to convince my girlfriend/wife?

Women Going Our Way begins at home. Radicals have deliberately stigmatised the relational bond, weaponising it as a political instrument by pitting women against men the moment a man asserts himself as such. This strategy has yielded profit for regimes and ruin for households—disintegrating nations in order to remake them. The aim of WGOW is to mend that rupture. By standing firm as a man—clear in your authority and unwavering in your purpose—your wife or girlfriend should follow. She must recognise that the cultural programming intends to provoke an ungoverned, hostile, and emotional response, and she should possess the virtue to master it.

Yet you cannot repair in one hour what her father failed to instil in twenty years. It is the father’s duty to raise obedient daughters; many have failed—either absent altogether or ruled by the women of their house, allowing daughters to run loose in a world not shaped for them.

WGOW encourages men to begin this restoration across the domestic sphere—among sisters, daughters, close companions, and female kin—guiding them back to obedience and femininity, so that upright men and the wider order are not forced to start from ruins. Traditional cultures understood this well: women were raised for marriage, and an unwed daughter was held a dishonour.

How Should Women Vote? Should They Renounce the Franchise? Would That Not Weaken the Political Base?

In the present condition—where modernity’s machinery demands engagement—absolute renunciation may, for many, remain impractical. However, within the framework of Women Going Our Way, a dignified compromise arises: women ought to vote in accord with the wishes of their husband, guardian, or rightful male head. This restores the proper chain of command, wherein the woman’s civic action is no longer a rival authority but an extension of the man’s household will.

This is neither submission to a party nor passive conformity, but a sacred alignment of the household as a singular political and spiritual unit. When rightly ordered, the family does not fragment its voice across factions; it speaks with one mouth. Far from weakening the political base, this strengthens it—discipline always strengthens. The enemy’s base thrives on atomisation; ours thrives on unity. What they would call weakness is in truth a return to principle.

Where no righteous man governs her vote, a woman is encouraged to abstain rather than lend strength to a corrupted order. The vote is not sacred—the will is. Let the will of a godly man rule, and the nation shall follow.

Is This a Religious Faith or a Secular Movement?

This movement is neither secular nor aligned with the Abrahamic systems that supplanted the old ways. We do not cloak ourselves in monotheistic moralism, nor appeal to their desert doctrines for validation. Ours is not a faith in their sense—but a return, a reordering of life in accordance with the metaphysical principle of hierarchy, sovereignty, and sacred function. It is the re-feminisation of woman and the restoration of male authority, standing firmly against both the degenerate feminist cult and the emasculated reactions that seek only withdrawal or despair.

In the traditional Roman order, manus denoted the legal and sacral authority of the husband over his wife, placing her under his potestas as a member of his domus, thereby transferring her from her father’s household into his sovereign guardianship. If rooted in anything, we are rooted in the Romano-European Tradition—an unbroken civilisational current of hierarchy, law, and sacred male authority, untainted by the distortions and moral inversions of the Abrahamic rupture; a Tradition violently overturned by the Pilgrim creed of the United States, which rejected the Old World in its entirety and enshrined rebellion, levelling, and feminine moralism as the new civic faith.

This is a proactive and affirmative restoration—not confined to one time, one people, or one name—but echoing the perennial order seen across high civilisations, where the man stands as cultural axis and lawgiver. It proceeds from no dogma, but from the immemorial truth that spiritual authority descends, tiered, from the highest principle into temporal form. Every civilisation of worth has known this; no Abrahamic confession is required, and none shall be imposed. You need not renounce your ancestral path, though you are free to transcend its recent deformities. What binds us in this aim is not sect, but will.

Men and women who recognise this eternal pattern, who see that the collapse was engineered through the abolition of female obedience and the severance of male authority, will find in this movement a path of rectification. Its aim is clear: to restore the ancient form by which women, through dignity and devotion, relinquish modern legalist and managerial autonomy to return to the charge of a lawful male guardian—pater, maritus, or entrusted tutor—under the restored patria potestas of the pater familias, through whom spiritual, legal, and domestic authority flows in accordance with the ancient order.

This is no theological dispute; it is a civilisational reassertion. While other groups have dithered, while courts maim sons and erase daughters, while regimes surgically dismantle the household, we act. The time of retreat is over. The men shall stand. The women shall follow. The world shall be made whole again.

In the traditional schema, the supreme ordering principle flows downward through sacred intermediaries—king, pontiff, noble, father—each a living conduit of the eternal fire. Beneath him, the woman; beneath her, the children; and through all, the household becomes an altar. This is the root from which all order, beauty, and meaning arise. We restore that. No further doctrine is needed. Only action.

Why do you invoke Satan as an important figure? Isn’t Satan an Abrahamic figure?

Though Satan is nominally an Abrahamic figure, The Luciferian Standpoint reflects a broader ontotheological pattern—one that long predates Christianity and appears across cultures as the myth of revolt, inversion, and the usurpation of rightful order. Christianity, far from opposing this current, absorbed and moralised it: casting disobedience as salvation, inverting divine hierarchy into universal egalitarianism, and elevating the meek, the resentful, and the broken as spiritual exemplars. In its mythos, man is not perfected through order and ascent, but saved through surrender and self-abasement. The suffragettes and radical feminists merely reclaimed the other face of this myth, embracing the Serpent and Eve as liberators, influenced by occult sources such as Blavatsky’s Lucifer magazine and feminist scripture-forgeries like The Woman’s Bible.

The movement we oppose is not merely political or economic, but metaphysical: it sanctifies chaos, places the lower above the higher, and grants moral licence to the resentful. This is not unique to Christianity; the radicals impose their dualistic frame—passive God versus active Satan—onto all traditions, moralising from below and condemning masculine command as tyranny. But patriarchy is older than Christianity and deeper than any single religion. The radicals have colonised symbols and rituals from cultures they once despised, weaponising even Graeco-Roman legacies against their native structures. We reject this imposed dialectic. The hierarchy of man, father, and sacred authority belongs to no church—it is perennial. The men who failed before us lacked metaphysical clarity and resolve. We do not.

I am a legal professional in X Jurisdiction, may I contribute?

You are welcome to contact us and contribute a Restoration Document for your region. Thank you.

Is this legal advice?

No. WGOW is not a provider of legal counsel and does not offer certified legal advice. We are a global social deradicalisation movement, created to counterbalance the proliferation of feminist-oriented NGOs operating under the guise of humanism and secular rationalism.

All materials provided—including the Restoration Document—are to be understood as templates, moral frameworks, or ceremonial declarations. They must be reviewed and adapted by qualified legal professionals to suit the laws of your jurisdiction. Nothing we provide constitutes actionable legal advice.

The Restoration Document is strictly voluntary for all parties and must not be used under coercion or duress. Any attempt to apply it as a binding legal instrument must be undertaken with full consent and in consultation with appropriate legal authorities.

Until laws evolve to accommodate such frameworks, our materials should be regarded as social and moral declarations, not legally enforceable contracts. You are solely responsible for verifying the legality of any use or adaptation of our materials in your region.