•
Do people remember the dark essence of the devil? And is it a factor in mundane life? Satan has had such a public relations revolution under Gnostic conceptions, the relativising of the true ontological Evil and the Masonic tenet of equality and innate goodness of all. Under modern social critical…
Note: Although taken by some scholars entirely as a subversive force against the prevailing social hierarchy, Buddhism is also interpreted in its most original form and by its own stated aims as the restoration of a corrupted materialised aristocratic ascesis by and for the elite, despite later peasant innovations. Its western promulgation is primarily as an egalitarian democratic force of subversion and radicalism.
Both are true; ancient Buddhism has existed as the driving force behind stable hierarchical and aristocratic structures rooted in an eastern elite reformation of the period that has provided attack vectors for democratic and radical egalitarian forces of nihilist dissolution of principles, particularly by subversive global cult organisations in the modern West.
WGOW is principally a global social deradicalisation movement established to counterbalance the proliferation of organisations advancing feminist radicalisation under the language of humanism. Its publications provide political, cultural, spiritual, moral and social commentary, together with model documents intended to serve as polemical, ceremonial and practical instruments.
The Restoration Documents are published as a polemical vehicle and practical stopgap pending the reinstatement of a formal legal framework for male guardianship. They do not establish any legal status of male guardianship under present law, because no such status presently exists.
WGOW is not a law firm, legal clinic, chambers, regulated legal-services provider, solicitor, attorney or certified legal adviser. Nothing published by WGOW constitutes legal advice, legal representation or a recommendation that any particular person execute, submit, register, rely upon or act under any document.
Accessing, reading, downloading, adapting, signing or corresponding with WGOW concerning a document does not create a solicitor–client, attorney–client, fiduciary, advisory or other professional relationship. No information published by WGOW should be treated as a substitute for advice from a suitably qualified and independently instructed legal professional.
All Restoration Documents are general templates rather than instruments prepared for the circumstances of any particular person. They may be incomplete, unsuitable, invalid, ineffective or unenforceable in a particular jurisdiction, even when signed by all parties.
Any legal effect depends upon the nature of the instrument, the capacity and informed consent of the parties, its terms, its proper execution, any prescribed wording or statutory form, witnessing, notarisation, registration, filing and the law and public policy applicable in the relevant jurisdiction. A signature alone does not guarantee that a document creates legally enforceable rights, duties or powers.
Users are solely responsible for investigating the law applicable to them, adapting the document where legally appropriate and obtaining independent legal advice before making any legal filing or attempting to rely upon a document as legally operative. WGOW does not warrant that any document is current, complete, legally effective or appropriate for any intended purpose.
The Restoration Documents are intended exclusively for competent adults acting knowingly and voluntarily. Consent must be free, informed and continuing. Coercion, duress, undue influence, deception, entrapment, intimidation, threats, exploitation of incapacity or concealment of material terms are wholly contrary to their purpose.
Nothing published by WGOW authorises unlawful control, restraint, dispossession, abuse, violence or interference with any person’s legal rights. Any use of a document for such a purpose is expressly repudiated and falls entirely outside the use contemplated or endorsed by WGOW.
Each party must remain free to withhold or withdraw consent. Where an instrument has acquired legal effect, any formal procedure required for its amendment, termination or revocation remains governed by the applicable law and should be undertaken with independent legal advice.
Until culture changes and laws emerge to permit the reinstatement of a formal male guardianship framework, a Restoration Document may operate principally as a moral, cultural, social, ceremonial or expressive declaration rather than as an enforceable legal instrument.
Users must distinguish between the symbolic or private meaning attributed to a document and any rights or powers recognised by law. No ceremonial, religious, political or interpersonal understanding can override mandatory law or confer a legal authority which the applicable jurisdiction does not recognise.
Each person who downloads, modifies, executes, distributes, files or relies upon a Restoration Document does so upon his or her own responsibility. WGOW is not responsible for unauthorised alterations, misrepresentations, unlawful applications or uses inconsistent with the document’s stated conditions of consent.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, WGOW disclaims liability arising from reliance upon the templates without appropriate independent legal advice or from their adaptation, execution, interpretation, enforcement or misuse by third parties.
Your anonymous donation contributes to server and bandwidth costs, advertising campaigns, public awareness, creative work, articles, and media. We are a young initiative, single-handedly confronting billionaire internationalist NGOs and radical social engineers whose work began before any of us were born. Against such odds, resources and manpower are perpetually scarce.
If you have benefited from our information or templates, or simply believe in what we are doing, please consider donating to help us produce and bring you more, and help keep Women Going Our Way.
Payment processed by BTCPay Server
The Restoration Document lies at the heart of WGOW. Within it, women voluntarily cede legal power of attorney to a male guardian or trustee—either through binding contract or symbolic act. This initiates real-world change in domains long dominated by radicals, and transcends mere discourse. WGOW Online serves as a resource hub, offering templates, infographics, and guidance. At no stage is coercion involved; participation demands willing commitment to the higher cause of Concordia. Women are already empowered—so let them wield that power; what fortune, that the very gift exalted by radicals may be turned against them, like a Golden Fleece returned to rightful hands. One might even speak of its inevitability: the double edge of reversal now turned to just use. We do not offer legal advice or official documentation; all actions remain your own responsibility and must be undertaken with discernment.
WGOW is a true campaign of women’s empowerment. Wardship under a man is the highest form of empowerment for a woman—precisely why radicals seek to deny it. They would rather you remain their pawn, estranged from the masculine and weakened, your soul turned against your natural source of prosperity. A man, in his rightful place, is a woman’s strength, her shelter, her home, her leader, her guardian. WGOW restores empowerment through masculine guidance and protection—not through humanist abstractions, nation-state destabilisation, regime-change propaganda, or depopulation engineering masked as ‘empowerment’ and ‘health care’. Nor through the parasitic abuse of men and children for profit. Every time a woman is weaponised by political subverters or lecherous attorneys against a man, she is turned against another woman’s son, set in opposition to her foremothers, and—often enough—even to her own child. Daughters forsake mothers; mothers betray sons and daughters. This foreign malignancy must be rooted out; its damages repaired with foresight and will.
Conservatorship is a legal arrangement in which a court appoints a conservator to manage the personal or financial affairs of an individual (the conservatee) who is deemed incapable due to mental or physical impairment. It differs from Power of Attorney (POA) in several key respects:
Volition: Conservatorship is involuntary; the conservatee does not grant consent and has limited influence over the choice of conservator. POA, by contrast, is entirely voluntary—the principal selects the agent and retains the right to revoke the authority at any time.
Establishment: Conservatorship arises through judicial proceedings, requiring formal hearings and medical evaluation. POA is executed through a signed legal instrument, typically notarised or witnessed.
Oversight: Conservatorship entails ongoing court supervision; conservators must submit regular reports and financial accountings. POA operates independently of the court unless contested.
Both mechanisms are designed to assist individuals unable to manage their own affairs, yet they carry markedly different legal consequences and degrees of autonomy. Legal counsel should be sought to determine the most appropriate course.
Women Going Our Way begins at home. Radicals have deliberately stigmatised the relational bond, weaponising it as a political instrument by pitting women against men the moment a man asserts himself as such. This strategy has yielded profit for regimes and ruin for households—disintegrating nations in order to remake them. The aim of WGOW is to mend that rupture. By standing firm as a man—clear in your authority and unwavering in your purpose—your wife or girlfriend should follow. She must recognise that the cultural programming intends to provoke an ungoverned, hostile, and emotional response, and she should possess the virtue to master it.
Yet you cannot repair in one hour what her father failed to instil in twenty years. It is the father’s duty to raise obedient daughters; many have failed—either absent altogether or ruled by the women of their house, allowing daughters to run loose in a world not shaped for them.
WGOW encourages men to begin this restoration across the domestic sphere—among sisters, daughters, close companions, and female kin—guiding them back to obedience and femininity, so that upright men and the wider order are not forced to start from ruins. Traditional cultures understood this well: women were raised for marriage, and an unwed daughter was held a dishonour.
In the present condition—where modernity’s machinery demands engagement—absolute renunciation may, for many, remain impractical. However, within the framework of Women Going Our Way, a dignified compromise arises: women ought to vote in accord with the wishes of their husband, guardian, or rightful male head. This restores the proper chain of command, wherein the woman’s civic action is no longer a rival authority but an extension of the man’s household will.
This is neither submission to a party nor passive conformity, but a sacred alignment of the household as a singular political and spiritual unit. When rightly ordered, the family does not fragment its voice across factions; it speaks with one mouth. Far from weakening the political base, this strengthens it—discipline always strengthens. The enemy’s base thrives on atomisation; ours thrives on unity. What they would call weakness is in truth a return to principle.
Where no righteous man governs her vote, a woman is encouraged to abstain rather than lend strength to a corrupted order. The vote is not sacred—the will is. Let the will of a godly man rule, and the nation shall follow.
This movement is neither secular nor aligned with the Abrahamic systems that supplanted the old ways. We do not cloak ourselves in monotheistic moralism, nor appeal to their desert doctrines for validation. Ours is not a faith in their sense—but a return, a reordering of life in accordance with the metaphysical principle of hierarchy, sovereignty, and sacred function. It is the re-feminisation of woman and the restoration of male authority, standing firmly against both the degenerate feminist cult and the emasculated reactions that seek only withdrawal or despair.
In the traditional Roman order, manus denoted the legal and sacral authority of the husband over his wife, placing her under his potestas as a member of his domus, thereby transferring her from her father’s household into his sovereign guardianship. If rooted in anything, we are rooted in the Romano-European Tradition—an unbroken civilisational current of hierarchy, law, and sacred male authority, untainted by the distortions and moral inversions of the Abrahamic rupture; a Tradition violently overturned by the Pilgrim creed of the United States, which rejected the Old World in its entirety and enshrined rebellion, levelling, and feminine moralism as the new civic faith.
This is a proactive and affirmative restoration—not confined to one time, one people, or one name—but echoing the perennial order seen across high civilisations, where the man stands as cultural axis and lawgiver. It proceeds from no dogma, but from the immemorial truth that spiritual authority descends, tiered, from the highest principle into temporal form. Every civilisation of worth has known this; no Abrahamic confession is required, and none shall be imposed. You need not renounce your ancestral path, though you are free to transcend its recent deformities. What binds us in this aim is not sect, but will.
Men and women who recognise this eternal pattern, who see that the collapse was engineered through the abolition of female obedience and the severance of male authority, will find in this movement a path of rectification. Its aim is clear: to restore the ancient form by which women, through dignity and devotion, relinquish modern legalist and managerial autonomy to return to the charge of a lawful male guardian—pater, maritus, or entrusted tutor—under the restored patria potestas of the pater familias, through whom spiritual, legal, and domestic authority flows in accordance with the ancient order.
This is no theological dispute; it is a civilisational reassertion. While other groups have dithered, while courts maim sons and erase daughters, while regimes surgically dismantle the household, we act. The time of retreat is over. The men shall stand. The women shall follow. The world shall be made whole again.
In the traditional schema, the supreme ordering principle flows downward through sacred intermediaries—king, pontiff, noble, father—each a living conduit of the eternal fire. Beneath him, the woman; beneath her, the children; and through all, the household becomes an altar. This is the root from which all order, beauty, and meaning arise. We restore that. No further doctrine is needed. Only action.
Though Satan is nominally an Abrahamic figure, The Luciferian Standpoint reflects a broader ontotheological pattern—one that long predates Christianity and appears across cultures as the myth of revolt, inversion, and the usurpation of rightful order. Christianity, far from opposing this current, absorbed and moralised it: casting disobedience as salvation, inverting divine hierarchy into universal egalitarianism, and elevating the meek, the resentful, and the broken as spiritual exemplars. In its mythos, man is not perfected through order and ascent, but saved through surrender and self-abasement. The suffragettes and radical feminists merely reclaimed the other face of this myth, embracing the Serpent and Eve as liberators, influenced by occult sources such as Blavatsky’s Lucifer magazine and feminist scripture-forgeries like The Woman’s Bible.
The movement we oppose is not merely political or economic, but metaphysical: it sanctifies chaos, places the lower above the higher, and grants moral licence to the resentful. This is not unique to Christianity; the radicals impose their dualistic frame—passive God versus active Satan—onto all traditions, moralising from below and condemning masculine command as tyranny. But patriarchy is older than Christianity and deeper than any single religion. The radicals have colonised symbols and rituals from cultures they once despised, weaponising even Graeco-Roman legacies against their native structures. We reject this imposed dialectic. The hierarchy of man, father, and sacred authority belongs to no church—it is perennial. The men who failed before us lacked metaphysical clarity and resolve. We do not.
You are welcome to contact us and contribute a Restoration Document for your region. Thank you.
No. WGOW is not a provider of legal counsel and does not offer certified legal advice. We are a global social deradicalisation movement, created to counterbalance the proliferation of feminist-oriented NGOs operating under the guise of humanism and secular rationalism.
All materials provided—including the Restoration Document—are to be understood as templates, moral frameworks, or ceremonial declarations. They must be reviewed and adapted by qualified legal professionals to suit the laws of your jurisdiction. Nothing we provide constitutes actionable legal advice.
The Restoration Document is strictly voluntary for all parties and must not be used under coercion or duress. Any attempt to apply it as a binding legal instrument must be undertaken with full consent and in consultation with appropriate legal authorities.
Until laws evolve to accommodate such frameworks, our materials should be regarded as social and moral declarations, not legally enforceable contracts. You are solely responsible for verifying the legality of any use or adaptation of our materials in your region.